04-11-13 RTI International Metals (RTI)

$250m (+37.5m) sen unsec cb coming tonight from BARC/CITI. Terms: 6.5 yrs, 1.625%-2.125% up 30-35%, pctns. UOP = gcp/cap ex/potential 3% buy back. Existing 3% trades rich 2 model due to outright ownership. -2.8% up 32% @116 vs cls = L+165 (30%), theo=110.65. Small but solid B credit w/good liquidity. Aerospace = 55% of rev w/exp growth this yr (demand for fuel efficient aircraft), defense= 20% rev which has some political risk.

 

PF Cash = 340m

Debt = 483m

LTM EBITDA = 97m

FCF -54m

Lev = 5x

Mkt cap = 909m

 

3yr $150m undrawn sec/rev = L+200, we’d use L+400 for 6.5 yr. ADV = 315k so hard to realize vol, no leaps, brw a ? on way down, we’ll cap vol at 30. Theo = 104.3. History does repeat itself in our market so look at 3%. Clear l/only demand, stk -5%. This is a STEEL.

 

Producer of titanium mill products, fabricated titanium and specialty metal components. RTI is a small titanium producer w/customers in aerospace, defense, energy, & medical device markets. Acq Rennele 2/12 for $183m cash, provider of eng service to same sectors, will provide some diversification. Aerospace 55% of rev, expect growth 2013 driven by demand for fuel-efficient aircraft. Defense about 20% revenues, some risk of cuts via sequestration. Liquidity good w/$150m secured rev undrawn (L+200, matures 2/17)

Our assigned spread L+400

 

At the mids, L+600, 35v, 50bps borrow, new issue models 1.5-2pts cheap.

 

RTI primarily a metals processor, so we compared it to KALU, X, DCO (specialty aerospace materials), ATI, and AA. Both X and AA are vertically integrated in steel and aluminum, so companies reflect commensurately higher leverage and earnings volatility. Meanwhile, pro forma leverage looks to be 33% of total cap, 1x LTM EBITDA, assuming no immediate buyback of 2015 converts. For comparison, other materials processors (KALU, ATI, DCO) average 39% debt/debt+mkt cap, 3x LTM EBITDA. Business profile should position company well for growth as overall industrial economy improves. Our only complaint is that company not a great cash generator and apparently has no cost pass-through on its long-term supply contracts, which could result in periodic risk to operating margin. Over time, we’d like to see co. look to build some add’l cash balances to hedge this risk. However, in the meantime, our credit estimate builds in some compensation for this potential volatility.

 

Financial Comps

1yr Sales 1yr EBITDA YTD Stock 1yr Fwd   1yr Fwd   LTM

Mkt Cap Leverage  Groeth     Margin    Return   EV/Sales EV/EBITDA  FCF

DCO       222    62.3%     1.5%      11.7%      29.2%     0.7x     6.1x      32

KALU     1,214   23.9%     6.3%      13.6%      2.4%      0.9x     6.3x      108

AA       8,887   50.1%     0.9%      11.6%      -3.9%     0.8x     7.1x      236

X        2,578   60.5%     -2.7%      5.9%     -24.8%     0.3x     5.4x      412

ATI      3,338   30.7%     2.6%      11.3%      2.9%      0.9x     7.9x      68

Average          45.5%     1.7%      10.8%      1.1%      0.7x     6.6x

RTI       910    19.4%     6.7%      14.2%      8.5%      1.3x     9.0x     (53)

 

Trading Comps

Issuer          Mkt Cap Leverage Ref Security     Prem/Z-spd

Ducommun          222      62.3% 9 3/4 ’18 (’17c)    640

Kaiser Aluminum  1,214     23.9% 8 1/4 ’20 (’18c)    462

Alcoa            8,887     50.1% 7yr sr CDS          370

US Steel         2,578     60.5% 7yr sr CDS          790

Allegheny Tech   3,338     30.7% 5.95 ’21 (’20c)     270

RTI               910      19.4%                     550

 

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>